.png)
Pomona Sanctions Student Groups Involved in Oct. 7th Protests
- Rachel Svoyskiy
- Nov 26, 2024
- 2 min read
Updated: Nov 27, 2024
Student protesters inside Carnegie Hall.
On November 1st, Pomona College’s Judicial Council (JBoard) issued sanctions against Claremont Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) after finding the organization guilty of one of six alleged violations of Pomona’s Student Code of Conduct. The charges stemmed from SJP’s participation in the October 7th occupation of Carnegie Hall.
The lone charge sustained by JBoard pertained to “irresponsible or negligent conduct,” defined as behavior that “results in theft, damage, physical harm or threat to a member of the Pomona College community’s property or safety.” SJP, however, was cleared of five other charges, including harassment, unauthorized access to college property, and damage to college property.
The board imposed seven sanctions, most notably the suspension of the organization’s Instagram account until March 31st, 2025. The club will also be required to issue a “community apology” and participate in a series of mandatory meetings with their faculty advisor.
SJP has not publicly commented on the ruling, but did release a statement on the day of their hearing framing the disciplinary process as an attempt to stifle dissent. “By criminalizing the oldest school-affiliated group centered on Palestinian liberation, admin makes it clearer than ever that their priority is continuing to support israeli [sic] apartheid,” they wrote.
JBoard also brought charges against Claremont Undercurrents, a student newspaper aligned with progressive campus activist groups. According to a statement on Undercurrents’ social media, JBoard found them not responsible for failing to comply with Pomona administrators’ requests during the protest. However, prior to their November 4th hearing, Undercurrents had accepted responsibility for unauthorized access to Carnegie Hall.
Representatives from Undercurrents will be required to meet with Pomona Dean of Campus Life Josh Eisenberg to “clarify coverage guidelines,” and will have to attend “training session(s) on… following College policy as a news media organization.”
“We remain outraged by the administration’s attempt to suppress coverage of Palestine solidarity organizing through their punitive charges against Undercurrents,” they wrote on social media. “Our case is part of a wave of harsh repression against students speaking and acting in solidarity with Palestine across the country, and exemplifies the well-documented Palestine Exception to free speech and protest.”
Pomona Divest from Apartheid (PDfA), another student group involved in the Oct. 7th protests, evaded sanctions because they are not a registered student organization. A Pomona College spokesperson told The Student Life that all disciplinary matters related to registered student organizations had been addressed by JBoard.
I appreciate the depth of research and clarity in your writing. This piece provides a fresh and compelling take on the subject. pips just be patient
The part about Undercurrents being pushed into “training sessions” and coverage guidelines feels like it could get messy fast—student journalism needs standards, but it also needs independence so it’s not just PR with extra steps. Not sure why, but it reminded me of how people hunt for “approved” templates elsewhere; I’d previously stumbled across https://stylelooklab.com in a totally different context, and the framing always shapes what choices feel “allowed.”
It’s also interesting (and kind of worrying) that one group avoided sanctions mainly because they aren’t registered—seems like that incentivizes operating in a gray area rather than engaging openly. Randomly, this made me think of how people treat “rules” with online tools too; I saw a site doing a “free ghibli ai style generator” thing recently, and the fine print ends up being the real story, same as with campus policies.
What I keep coming back to is how narrow the upheld finding was (“irresponsible or negligent conduct”) while the more specific claims didn’t stick—feels like that distinction matters for how students read the process going forward. Side note, the whole “clarify coverage guidelines” thing for student media reminded me of a tool I’ve used for planning time, a playback speed time calculator — policies always sound simple until you’re forced to define them in practice.
Film App Android ofrece una experiencia optimizada para usuarios que buscan una aplicación funcional y bien diseñada. Su estructura organizada facilita la navegación entre las diferentes herramientas disponibles, permitiendo una interacción cómoda y eficiente. La aplicación ha sido desarrollada para mantener un rendimiento estable incluso en dispositivos con distintas configuraciones. Gracias a su diseño moderno y adaptable, proporciona una experiencia agradable para una amplia variedad de usuarios. Además, las optimizaciones constantes contribuyen a mejorar la velocidad, la estabilidad y la compatibilidad con dispositivos Android actuales.