Civil Rights Complaint Filed Over Claremont Colleges Diversity Scholarships
- Emilio Bankier and Sarah McPeek
- Sep 20, 2025
- 4 min read
Updated: Sep 21, 2025

The Equal Protection Project filed a Federal Civil Rights Complaint on Aug. 28 with the Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights (OCR), alleging that a number of programs and scholarships at the Claremont Colleges violate Titles VI and IX of the Civil Rights Act.
The 23-page complaint lists 14 different scholarships and programs available to students at Claremont Graduate University and Claremont McKenna, Pomona, Pitzer, Harvey Mudd, and Scripps Colleges on the basis of their race, ethnic background, or gender. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on race, color, or national origin by any institution or program receiving federal financial assistance, while Title IX similarly prohibits sex-based discrimination.
The listed programs include the Mellon Mays Undergraduate Fellowship, a competitive program for undergraduate students wishing to pursue a Ph.D. in the humanities or related fields. The MMUF is offered by each Claremont College and other institutions nationwide.
Previously, Pomona’s Career Development Office website described the MMUF as available to “to underrepresented students.” Since July, the mention of "underrepresented students” has been removed.
“We are aware of a complaint filed with the OCR and are currently reviewing its contents,” a representative of Pomona said in a statement to the Independent. “While it would be inappropriate to comment on the specifics at this time, Pomona College reaffirms its commitment to fair and equitable programs as a central component of its educational mission.”
The Mellon Foundation, which endows the MMUF, did not respond to a request for comment.
In addition to the MMUF, the complaint identifies eight scholarships at Pitzer College, four at Claremont Graduate University, and one program at Harvey Mudd College. The complaint cites archived versions of the schools’ websites, where “discriminatory requirements” designated who could receive the scholarships.
The Pitzer programs cited include a scholarship awarded to “students of Middle Eastern descent or students who study the Middle East,” another whose criteria includes “any enrolled African American student with financial need and good academic standing,” and one for which “minority females” are “strongly preferred” candidates.
The four CGU scholarships listed in the complaint are the Black Scholars Award; the Ruth Roach English Award, given annually “to an African American student studying English”; a fellowship that “aids African American and Hispanic students who are pursuing degrees in any discipline at CGU”; and the Pat Soldano Fellowship for Women Leaders.
Like Pomona’s MMUF webpage, many of the scholarships and programs mentioned have had their descriptions changed in the last year, with mention of racial, ethnic, or sex-based eligibility requirements removed. Pitzer’s William Randolph Hearst Foundation Endowed Scholarship, which was previously reserved for “minority students with demonstrated financial need,” no longer mentions minority status, and now advertises admittance for “students based on demonstrated financial need.” Similarly, the Lisa Specht Endowment for Women of Pitzer College is now described as “provid[ing] scholarships for New Student Resources and need-based education aid” rather than specifying “support to female students.”
The Harvey Mudd Women’s Inclusion in Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics program is also singled out, though it does not appear to offer any scholarships or awards besides attendance to the high school summer program and a waiver for HMC’s application-fee. HMC’s website does not currently specify that candidates must be female, though an archived version of the page from December of 2024 includes the phrase “Interact with other college-bound women who share their passion for STEM,” which has since been replaced with “Interact with other college-bound students who share their passion for STEM.” Photos from a previous year also appear to capture a group of exclusively female participants. EPP argues in the complaint that the “program’s framing as a ‘Women’s STEM program’ and the promotional language clearly signals that the program is intended for women, and would dissuade males from applying or Harvey Mudd from seriously considering men.”
The Equal Protection Project (EPP) is a branch of the Legal Insurrection Foundation (LIF), founded and led by Cornell Law School professor and conservative blogger William A. Jacobson. The LIF was born out of Jacobson’s blog, “Legal Insurrection,” and has become a prominent conservative non-profit. Before the EPP, its flagship project was CriticalRace.org, an extensive database of Critical Race Theory programs at educational institutions, which describes itself as “a resource for parents and students concerned about how Critical Race Theory, and implementation of Critical Race Training, impacts education.”
“The Claremont Colleges are among the most elite and highly-ranked liberal arts colleges in the nation. That race- and sex-based discriminatory scholarships exist at such highly ranked institutions is shocking and reflects how Critical Race Theory and its offshoots like Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, are deeply embedded in the campus culture,” said Jacobson in a statement to the Independent.
“We do not want these scholarships terminated, we want the discriminatory provisions removed. We want students to have access to the funding, but every student should have fair and equal opportunity for scholarships without regard to race, color, national origin, or sex.”
In addition to scholarships, EPP has previously challenged faculty hiring programs with potentially discriminatory criteria at other institutions. Jacobson did not say whether Claremont Colleges programs, including Pomona College’s Chau Mellon Fellowship, offered to pre- and post-doctoral graduate students who “must contribute to increasing the diversity” of the college, were being considered by the organization. Pomona, Scripps, CMC and Pitzer are members of the Consortium for Faculty Diversity.
The complaint is the third filed with the OCR against Pomona College in the last two years, and the second lodged against Scripps College this year. The prior complaints alleged that the Colleges had failed to protect students and adequately respond to antisemitism and Islamophobia.
“As of this time, Scripps College has not been informed by the Office of Civil Rights that it has accepted or is investigating this complaint,” a Scripps representative told the Independent in an email. “The College is reviewing the matter closely to determine next steps.”
Representatives for CMC, HMC, Pitzer, and CGU did not respond to a request for comment.
.png)



Mình hay thử qua nhiều mục khác nhau để xem cách nền tảng vận hành. Khi chuyển giữa thể thao và casino live, mình thấy tốc độ phản hồi khá nhanh. Giao diện thiết kế đơn giản nên việc tìm kiếm khá dễ. Sau đó mình thử thêm nổ hũ và bắn cá để xem trải nghiệm chung. Trong lúc mình ghé kuwin tìm hiểu thêm thì thấy lô đề và đá gà cũng được tích hợp. Cá nhân mình thấy web khá thuận tiện khi sử dụng.
Mình thường đọc kỹ phần thống kê trước khi trải nghiệm một nền tảng giải trí trực tuyến. Khi xem qua các con số được công bố, mình thấy hệ thống đề cập đến lượng tài khoản hoạt động và số trò chơi phong phú. Trong quá trình tìm hiểu thêm về https://jun88.pizza/ mình nhận thấy cấu trúc nội dung được xây dựng mạch lạc, giúp người dùng dễ theo dõi. Giao diện nhìn gọn gàng và thân thiện. Cá nhân mình cảm thấy cách trình bày khá rõ ràng.
Vừa mở lên là thấy giao diện kiểu đồng bộ thật, bấm qua lại không bị lệch nhịp hay phải đoán xem nút nằm đâu nhà cái mm88 Nội dung cũng chia thành từng khối rõ ràng nên lướt nhanh vẫn nắm được ý chính, không bị ngợp chữ. Mình thích cái cách họ viết kiểu “ăn khớp” ngay từ đầu, đọc vài dòng là hiểu họ muốn hướng tới trải nghiệm liền mạch chứ không màu mè. Kéo xuống thấy các tiêu đề và box tách bạch, nhìn phát là biết phần nào là nội dung chính, phần nào chỉ là thông tin kèm theo.
Hôm nay lúc ngồi đọc vài bài chia sẻ trên mạng, mình vô tình thấy nhiều người nhắc đến GO8 nên tiện bấm vào xem thử. Mình chỉ lướt qua một lúc để tham khảo chứ chưa tìm hiểu chi tiết, nhưng cảm nhận ban đầu là giao diện khá dễ nhìn, các mục được sắp xếp gọn gàng và rõ ràng. Nhờ vậy, mình cũng nhanh chóng hình dung được cách bố trí nội dung mà không phải mất nhiều thời gian làm quen.
Trong quá trình mình trải nghiệm nhiều phiên truy cập, nền tảng TG88 mang lại cảm giác giao diện được thiết kế khá rõ ràng với cách phân tách giữa các khu vực trò chơi như poker, casino và thể thao. Việc tổ chức theo từng nhóm nội dung giúp mình dễ dàng định vị mục cần tìm mà không mất nhiều thời gian thao tác. Khi sử dụng, các chuyển đổi giữa danh mục diễn ra khá mượt và không bị gián đoạn. Hệ thống hiển thị theo khối giúp quan sát dễ hơn trên cả điện thoại lẫn máy tính, tạo cảm giác liền mạch và ổn định trong suốt quá trình trải nghiệm